Know where you stand with AI,
before you build further on it.

01What we offer.

A clear view of the organisation’s position, written for the board: what AI reaches, how it reads it, and where its picture departs from your own. From that view, the priorities that make the greatest difference are agreed and acted on. Diligence and oversight then follow each month as the organisation advances and grows, with an independent record of what was known and what was done.

02Why.

What AI repeats becomes the organisation’s answer, and the people accountable answer for it. The board faces 2 questions: is the organisation fit for AI visibility (found, read correctly and represented in terms you would stand behind), and are its directors and officers becoming increasingly, and unnecessarily, exposed as AI grows?

The cause sits close to home, which is why it can be put right: the organisation’s own online position is the root cause of 79% of misinformation or misrepresentation.

The board’s own position is measured. Three in 4 boards have approved major AI investments; 48% have not set governance expectations for AI, and 46% have not brought AI risk into their ongoing oversight. Approval without a view of what AI is saying, and doing, is where the exposure of directors and officers begins.

Boards and AI: approved, not overseen

Grant Thornton, 2026 AI Impact Survey; 950 business leaders, Feb. to Mar. 2026.

03Why now.

AI is already part of how the organisation is bought: 94% of B2B buyers state AI is an important or more meaningful source in their purchasing process.

Businesses now rank AI errors, misinformation and hallucination as their leading risk. Boards are advised to expect investors, regulators, plaintiffs’ firms and insurers to ask what the company knew, who was responsible and what the board oversaw. Understanding the position now means each further AI decision is taken knowing where the organisation stands.

Gallagher, 2026 AI Adoption and Risk Survey. Gallagher, governance guide for directors, Aug. 2026.

04Why us.

We bring 25 years of unbiased, outside-in view of organisations online. The Platform is built, tested across sectors and prepared for regulatory scrutiny, so the first reading arrives in weeks, against the 8 to 11 months an organisation typically needs to build the same capability itself. The reading is independent of the teams who publish, so the board has a view it can put before investors, regulators and insurers.

05How do you buy.

It begins with a private briefing, by invitation and at no charge. For qualifying organisations, an AI position report follows, written for the board, and walked through with you, so the decision rests on evidence. The work starts with the Gap Analysis. Each service has a defined scope and a published investment, the same for each organisation, fixed by the Statement of Work.

06What next.